We've all seen them. The "For Sale" signs realtor place in yards are commonplace. The signs typically take the same shape but come in a variety of colors and usually display contact information of the realtor. One company, however, is claiming the use of the color pink on these signs is its trademark and is seeking a federal trademark registration for the same.
On July 24th, the appropriately named Pink Realty, Inc. filed a federal trademark application for the "color pink as shown in the attached image." The application covers a variety of real estate services in Class 36, including "real estate agencies" and "real estate brokerage." According to the application, Pink Realty, Inc. has been using the color pink on these signs since November 22, 2009.
The dotted lines are not part of the mark, but rather "inform the viewer where and how color is used on the product or product package, while at the same time making it clear that the shape of the product, or the shape of the product package, is not claimed as part of the mark." TMEP 1202.05(d)(i).
Is it possible to claim a color as a trademark and obtain federal registration for it? Yes. UPS, for example, owns a registration for the color brown. But obtaining a color registration is not easy.
To start, color marks are never inherently distinctive. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., 529 U.S. 205, 211-12 (2000). A showing of acquired distinctiveness is always required to obtain a registration, and making that showing is difficult in the context of color marks. TMEP 1202.05(a). In other words, an applicant for a color mark must demonstrate that its use of the color identifies it as the source of the good or services in the mind of consumers (i.e., when consumers see color being used in the way the applicant is using it, they associate it with the applicant). For example, when most people see a brown delivery truck, they know it's a UPS truck.
Additionally, colors that are functional cannot be registered as trademarks. See Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Prods. Co., 514 U.S. 159, 165-66 (1995). Colors may be considered functional if they yield "a utilitarian or functional advantage, for example, yellow or orange for safety signs." TMEP 1202.05(b). Additionally, if a specific color is the natural by-product of a manufacturing process, that color may be considered functional ("In such a case, appropriation of the color by a single party would place others at a competitive disadvantage by requiring them to alter the manufacturing process."). Id.
Does the color pink on "For Sale" signs lend a utilitarian or functional advantage? Does it make the sign easier to see and, if so, is that a utilitarian or functional advantage? If the applicant can cross that hurdle, it will need to make a strong showing that its use of the color pink has acquired distinctiveness in the marketplace before it can obtain a registration.
Can Pink Realty obtain the rare color mark registration? Keep an eye on this application to find out.
Friday, July 28, 2017
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Amid Controversy, HBO Files Trademark Applications for CONFEDERATE
When HBO announced a new alternate history drama based on the southern states' successful secession from the union, it drew some controversy. But that didn't stop HBO from filing two applications to register the show's title as a federal trademark a couple days later.
On July 21, Home Box Office, Inc. filed two trademark applications for CONFEDERATE, in standard characters, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. HBO filed one application in Class 9 and the other in Class 41, covering the following goods and services:
On July 21, Home Box Office, Inc. filed two trademark applications for CONFEDERATE, in standard characters, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. HBO filed one application in Class 9 and the other in Class 41, covering the following goods and services:
- Video recordings featuring a dramatic television series; downloadable video recordings featuring a dramatic television series; downloadable computer games; downloadable computer game software for use with wireless devices and personal computers; downloadable multimedia file containing artwork, text, audio, video, games, and internet web links relating to television; video game cartridges and discs; video game software; mousepads; headphones and earphones; downloadable software in the nature of a mobile application for viewing videos featuring entertainment content relating to a dramatic television series; protective cases specially adapted for laptop computers, tablet computers, smart phones and other portable electronic devices, namely, media players, mobile phones and personal digital assistants; plastic, rubber or vinyl protective coverings specially adapted for laptop computers, tablet computers, smart phones and other portable electronic devices, namely, media players, mobile phones and personal digital assistant (Class 9);
- Entertainment services in the nature of a television series in the field of drama; providing entertainment information, news and commentary via an on-line global computer network; interactive online entertainment in the nature of a website containing non-downloadable photographic, video, audio and prose presentations, and video clips featuring content from or related to a television series in the field of drama (Class 41).
HBO filed the applications on an intent to use basis, suggesting it is not using the mark in commerce with the listed goods and services yet, but has a bona fide intention to do so in the near future (which makes sense considering the show has not yet aired). TMEP 806.01(b); 15 USC 1051(b). Before the marks can register (assuming the examination process goes smoothly), HBO will need to start using the CONFEDERATE mark in interstate commerce in conjunction with the listed services (which may, or may not, happen given the controversy). TMEP 1103; 15 USC 1051(c)-(d).
According to reports, production of Confederate will begin after the final season of Game of Thrones (the Game of Thrones creators are teaming up with HBO to create Confederate).
Monday, July 24, 2017
Are JALAPENO MAC BITES Merely Descriptive of Macaroni and Cheese Bite Sized Nuggets Filed with Jalapenos?
A delicious but possibly descriptive trademark application was filed on July 19th by a Florida company called Mac and Cheese Holdings, LLC (ed. - sounds like a great place to work). On that date, the company filed a federal trademark application for JALAPENO MAC BITES covering "macaroni and cheese bite sized nuggets filled with jalapenos and cream cheese and other cheeses and coated in breadcrumbs and baked" in Class 30.
The company filed the application on an intent to use basis, suggesting it is not selling these bites yet but has a bona fide intention to do so in the near future. TMEP 806.01(b); 15 USC 1051(b). Delicious, but is it merely descriptive of the underlying goods?
Under Section 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, marks that merely describe the underlying goods or services are not registerable on the Principal Register (where you want to be) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office without a showing of acquired distinctiveness (which is very difficult to show with an intent to use application).
According to TMEP 1209.01(b), "a mark is considered merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services." Even if a mark does not describe every purpose, feature, function, etc., it can still be merely descriptive if it describes one significant function, attribute, or property of the goods or services. Id.
What do you think? Does JALAPENO MAC BITES merely describe an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of macaroni and cheese bite sized nuggets filled with jalapenos and cream cheese and other cheeses and coated in breadcrumbs and baked? Or is it only suggestive of the goods in that it requires "imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods..." (and therefore can be registered on the Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness)? See TMEP 1209.01(a).
Keep an eye on this application and see what the Examining Attorney thinks in about three months when the application is examined.
The company filed the application on an intent to use basis, suggesting it is not selling these bites yet but has a bona fide intention to do so in the near future. TMEP 806.01(b); 15 USC 1051(b). Delicious, but is it merely descriptive of the underlying goods?
Under Section 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, marks that merely describe the underlying goods or services are not registerable on the Principal Register (where you want to be) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office without a showing of acquired distinctiveness (which is very difficult to show with an intent to use application).
According to TMEP 1209.01(b), "a mark is considered merely descriptive if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services." Even if a mark does not describe every purpose, feature, function, etc., it can still be merely descriptive if it describes one significant function, attribute, or property of the goods or services. Id.
What do you think? Does JALAPENO MAC BITES merely describe an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of macaroni and cheese bite sized nuggets filled with jalapenos and cream cheese and other cheeses and coated in breadcrumbs and baked? Or is it only suggestive of the goods in that it requires "imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods..." (and therefore can be registered on the Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness)? See TMEP 1209.01(a).
Keep an eye on this application and see what the Examining Attorney thinks in about three months when the application is examined.
Friday, July 21, 2017
Warner Bros. Files Applications to Register Hufflepuff, Gryffindor Emblems as Trademarks
It looks like you'll have to go through Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. if you want to use the Hufflepuff or Gryfinndor emblems as trademarks. On July 17, the company filed applications to register the emblems seen below as trademarks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
The applications for both emblems cover the same variety of merchandise, including the goods listed below:
The applications for both emblems cover the same variety of merchandise, including the goods listed below:
- Clothing for men, women and children, namely, dressing gowns, robes, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, hoodies, vests, pajamas, baby bodysuits, skirts, shorts, socks, cardigans, sweaters, pullovers, pants, trousers, leggings, lounge pants, dresses, jackets, swimwear, raincoats, ponchos, hats, caps, scarves, gloves, ties, bow ties, headbands, belts; footwear for men, women and children, namely, slippers and flip flops; masquerade and Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewith (Class 25);
- Decorative magnets; cellular telephone accessories, namely, cellular telephone covers and cellular telephone face covers (Class 9);
- Printed matter and paper goods, namely, notebooks, calendars, wall planners, posters, postcards, writing paper, envelopes, stickers, bookmarks, greeting cards, bookends, art prints on canvas, framed art prints, mounted and unmounted photographs (Class 16);
- Watches; cufflinks; jewelry, namely bracelets, rings, earrings and brooches; ornamental pins; key rings (trinkets or fobs) (Class 14).
Warner Bros. filed all these applications on an intent to use basis, suggesting (but not necessarily meaning) they are not using these marks in conjunction with the listed goods yet but have a bona fide intention to do so in the near future. TMEP 806.01(b); 15 USC 1051(b).
I'm not a Harry Potter guy, but aren't there more than two houses? According to my quick search, these are the only emblems filed by Warner Bros. (in 2017 at least) related to Harry Potter, but maybe the other emblems are coming soon.
Determining whether Warner Bros. owns a registration takes some work, however, considering the company owns 956 active trademark applications or registrations with the USPTO, including several standard character mark applications for the house names (and that doesn't include unregistered, common law trademarks). Earlier this year, Warner Bros. filed several applications for BUTTERBEER covering a variety of goods ranging from clothing items to dessert puddings to watches.
Determining whether Warner Bros. owns a registration takes some work, however, considering the company owns 956 active trademark applications or registrations with the USPTO, including several standard character mark applications for the house names (and that doesn't include unregistered, common law trademarks). Earlier this year, Warner Bros. filed several applications for BUTTERBEER covering a variety of goods ranging from clothing items to dessert puddings to watches.
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Virgin Enterprises Files Trademark Applications Covering "Space Travel Passenger Transportation Services"
Trademark applications covering space travel aren't that common, but they are starting to pop up more and more. For example, last summer I blogged about Paul Allen's Vulcan Space. The most recent applications, however, are from Richard Branson's Virgin Enterprises.
On July 13th, Virgin Enterprises filed two applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register the Virgin Orbit logo (one seen below and the other the same thing but against a black background) as a trademark.
The applications cover several goods and services related to space travel, air transport, and satellites, including:
On July 13th, Virgin Enterprises filed two applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to register the Virgin Orbit logo (one seen below and the other the same thing but against a black background) as a trademark.
The applications cover several goods and services related to space travel, air transport, and satellites, including:
- Launching of spacecraft, namely satellites and rockets, into orbit for others (Class 39);
- Space travel passenger transportation services (Class 39);
- Luggage check in for space travel (Class 39);
- Commercial space lines, namely, rockets, spacecraft (Class 12);
- Satellites for scientific purposes to be sent into orbit (Class 9)
- Satellite transmission of signals (Class 38)
The applications are based on similar trademark applications Virgin Enterprises filed in the United Kingdom on May 12, 2017. They appear to be related to Virgin Orbit (obviously), the newest member of the Virgin family.
Interestingly, these are not the first space travel-related trademark applications filed by Virgin Enterprises. Earlier this year, the company filed an application for VIRGIN ORBIT in standard characters covering the same goods and services listed in the logo applications. Additionally, the company has owned a trademark registration for the Virgin Galactic logo seen below, covering "Travel agency services, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation, space travel agency services; namely, booking of transportation into space" since November 2008.
Virgin filed several other trademark applications for variations of the Virgin Galactic logo back in 2014 and 2015 as well. None of those applications have registered yet, probably because Virgin Galactic does not appear to be using those variations of the logo in commerce and such use is required before the applications can mature into a registration given the intent to use filing basis. See TMEP 902.
According to my very quick search, Virgin and Vulcan appear to be the only companies with active trademark applications or registrations covering the transportation of passengers into space, save for one registration covering a spacecraft logo owned by an Excalibur Almaz Limited corporation on the Isle of Man.
Friday, July 14, 2017
Is RED CUP PONG Merely Descriptive of Beer Pong Tables?
College students might be in the best position to answer this question. On July 10th, a company in Virginia named Blue Ridge Product Solutions, LLC filed applications to register RED CUP PONG (in standard characters), and the stylized logo seen below, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Both applications cover "Game tables; inflatable mattress swimming floats for recreational use, namely, beer pong floats; games, namely, table top games, equipment sold as a unit for playing drinking games, parlor games, singing games played with cards and game components" in Class 28.
According to the applications and specimens submitted with the same (see above), Blue Ridge Products Solutions, LLC is in the business of selling party games and accessories and has been using the "Red Cup" marks at least as early as December 1, 2010.
But are the marks merely descriptive of the underlying goods? A mark that merely describes the goods in connection with which it is being used cannot be registered on the USPTO's Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness. TMEP 1209; 15 USC 1052(e)(1). A mark is merely descriptive " if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services." TMEP 1209.01(b). However, if a mark is deemed merely descriptive, it can be registered upon proof of "acquired distinctiveness," which means the mark has become distinctive as applied to the applicant's goods in commerce (i.e., consumers associate the mark with the applicant's goods, rather than only as a descriptive term). TMEP 1212; 15 USC 1052(f).
So does RED CUP PONG or RED CUP describe a feature, purpose, or use of drinking games and beer pong floats? Or do the terms "require imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods..." in which case the mark would be suggestive and registerable on the Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness. TMEP 1209.01(a).
We'll find out what the examining attorney assigned to this application thinks in about three months. The applicant might hope for an examiner without too many "fun" college experiences...
Both applications cover "Game tables; inflatable mattress swimming floats for recreational use, namely, beer pong floats; games, namely, table top games, equipment sold as a unit for playing drinking games, parlor games, singing games played with cards and game components" in Class 28.
According to the applications and specimens submitted with the same (see above), Blue Ridge Products Solutions, LLC is in the business of selling party games and accessories and has been using the "Red Cup" marks at least as early as December 1, 2010.
But are the marks merely descriptive of the underlying goods? A mark that merely describes the goods in connection with which it is being used cannot be registered on the USPTO's Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness. TMEP 1209; 15 USC 1052(e)(1). A mark is merely descriptive " if it describes an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of the specified goods or services." TMEP 1209.01(b). However, if a mark is deemed merely descriptive, it can be registered upon proof of "acquired distinctiveness," which means the mark has become distinctive as applied to the applicant's goods in commerce (i.e., consumers associate the mark with the applicant's goods, rather than only as a descriptive term). TMEP 1212; 15 USC 1052(f).
So does RED CUP PONG or RED CUP describe a feature, purpose, or use of drinking games and beer pong floats? Or do the terms "require imagination, thought, or perception to reach a conclusion as to the nature of those goods..." in which case the mark would be suggestive and registerable on the Principal Register without a showing of acquired distinctiveness. TMEP 1209.01(a).
We'll find out what the examining attorney assigned to this application thinks in about three months. The applicant might hope for an examiner without too many "fun" college experiences...
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
JAY Z's Company Files 15 Applications to Register JAYBO as a Trademark
According to my quick research, Jaybo is an animated character in the music video for "The Story of O.J.," a song released as part of JAY Z's new 4:44 album. The full video is available on YouTube. In the video, JAY Z highlights a long history of racist cartoons from major animation studios, including Disney and Warner Bros.
If these recent trademark applications are any indication, JAY Z has plans to take the JAYBO message even further. S. Carter Enterprises, LLC filed the JAYBO applications in fifteen different classes of goods and services (hence the fifteen applications), resulting in a vast range of goods and services being covered. Some of the goods and services covered by the JAYBO applications include:
- Entertainment services in the nature of music videos, cartoon and animated films and live-action, adventure, comedy, drama, music, cartoon and animated television series (Class 41);
- Downloadable motion pictures, music videos, films and television series, programs and shows featuring cartoon and animation, entertainment, adventure, comedy, drama, music, games, sports, live-action, artists, entertainers, the arts, pop culture, pre-recorded live concert footage of audio, visual and dramatic performances (Class 9);
- Broadcasting of cable television, television and radio programs (Class 38);
- Retail store services, wholesale store services, mail order services, on-line ordering services and on-line retail store services available through computer communications and interactive television, with all of the aforesaid featuring cosmetics, fragrances, hair, nail, bath and body products, candles, metal key rings and chains, recorded product, eyewear, music related items... (Class 35);
- Plush toys; dolls and doll accessories; doll costumes; board games; parlor games; card games (Class 28);
- Clothing, namely, shirts, T-shirts, rugby shirts, polo shirts, cardigans, jerseys, pants, jeans, culottes, cargo pants, stretch pants, overalls, jump suits, rompers... (Class 25);
- Furniture; bedroom and living room furniture, computer furniture, office furniture, lawn and outdoor furniture... (Class 20);
- Printed and related matter, namely, comic books, novels and posters (Class 16); and
- Cosmetics; cologne; toothpaste, deodorant (Class 3).
Each application was filed on an intent to use basis, suggesting S. Carter Enterprises is not using JAYBO in commerce with these goods and services yet but has a bona fide intention to do so in the near future. TMEP 806.01(b); 15 USC 1051(b). It also means the company must actually start using JAYBO with the listed goods and services before the applications will mature into trademark registrations. TMEP 902; 15 USC 1051(c)-(d).
If you're a JAY Z fan, keep an eye out for JAYBO merchandise, potentially coming soon.
If you're a JAY Z fan, keep an eye out for JAYBO merchandise, potentially coming soon.
Monday, July 3, 2017
Quarterly Index (4/1/17 - 6/30/17)
Entertainment Trademark Filings:
Other Unique Filings:
- Beyonce Spends $12,000 in Filing Fees on Trademark Applications For What May Be Her Twins' Names [6/30/17]
- Prince's Company Files Multiple Trademark Applications For Holographic Musical Performances [6/7/17]
- Ubisoft Files New SPLINTER CELL Trademark Application Covering Multi-Player Computer Games, eSports Competitions [5/19/17]
- Recent Trademark Application Suggests Megyn Kelly's New Sunday Night Show on NBC Might Have a Name [5/10/17]
- "Catch Me Outside" Girl Files Trademark Applications for CASH ME OUSSIDE [5/3/17]
- Is MTV Bringing Back TRL? [5/2/17]
- Disney Files Applications to Register UNIT ZERO, 5 Other Potential Shows or Movies as Trademarks [4/28/17]
- Viacom Files 8 Trademark Applications, Most Related to TV Shows [4/21/17]
- CBS Studios Files Two Trademark Applications for NCIS: RED [4/19/17]
- AOL Files 8 Trademark Applications for OATH [4/7/17]
- Company Associated With Power Rangers Movie Files 5 Trademark Applications for ROBYN HOODIE Logo [4/4/17]
- Commissioner of Baseball Files Four Applications to Register World Series Trophy as a Trademark [5/15/17]
- COVFEFE for Beer and 31 Other Applications to Register COVFEFE as a Trademark Filed in Less Than Two Weeks [6/15/17]
- Delaware Company Files Trademark Application for COTTON CANDY COMB OVER...Any Problem? [5/26/17]
- Amazon Files Applications to Register AMAZON SPHERES, and Sphere Design, as Trademarks [6/26/17]
- Android Creator Files 83 Trademark Applications for New "Essential" Brand, Hinting at Brand's Expansiveness [5/31/17]
- Company Behind RompHim Files Trademark Application for ROMPHER [5/22/17]
- California Company Files Trademark Application for BLOODY MARY ON DRAFT [5/1/17]
- Texas Proprietor Files Trademark Application for DOGGIE WETSUITS, But is it Merely Descriptive? Generic? [4/6/17]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)